S8 · 2–4 weeks

Verification Harness Build

Build a verification harness that generates demanding cases, compares behaviour and uses deliberate faults to prove the tests can fail.

A test fixture deliberately removes an access pin from a transaction mechanism. A separate comparison gauge rejects the changed result and catches it before release.

Discuss this engagement

Constructed handover specimen · not a client finding

A deliberate fault tests the test

Trigger
Would the harness notice if an access check stopped enforcing organisation boundaries?
What you receive
A controlled mutation removes the boundary in the test environment. The harness attempts the cross-organisation operation and must reject the mutated build.
Decision supported
If the suite stays green, the result is a coverage defect. The retained finding says which invariant escaped and what evidence closes it.

Who it is for

Products where ordinary example-based tests cannot expose enough of the failure surface.

The work
We build an in-repository harness that generates demanding cases, compares behaviour, inserts deliberate faults to grade the tests and leaves a repeatable coverage process with the team.
The boundary
The harness strengthens product-specific verification. It does not replace security testing, specialist assurance or human decisions about the product’s intended behaviour.

What you receive

A repository-integrated harness, measured coverage baseline and target, findings ledger and repeatable operating playbook.

Duration
2–4 weeks
Price (GBP)
£18,000
Commercial shape
fixed